3 ms·
I mean honestly infrasructurally the bay area sucks too, unless you happen to live in certain parts of the city or on the Caltrain (in which case transit is goo
by throwawaymaths 4y ago
I mean honestly infrasructurally the bay area sucks too, unless you happen to live in certain parts of the city or on the Caltrain (in which case transit is good but eye wateringly expensive). Try living in Alameda, Burlingame, San Leandro, etc.
Even so. Like nobody goes from the marina to the mission, or sunset to the mission. People never go to east bay.
As for meaningful entertainment I actually think Austin has about as much to offer as sf, but that could just be due to the circles I frequent.
Legit the thing I miss is altitude hiking (go climb a huge hill like mt. Tam, or string together four parks around my house and do a six km loop, mostly in parks). Barton creek is amazing though, and it's fantastic that you can forget you're inside a city for about 20km
- halfmatthalfcat 4y agoOh absolutely. I recently had to consider moving to the Bay as well and it was so incredibly underwhelming compared to the cost of living. This was looking at East Bay too. Impossible to get around, less-than-ideal access to entertainment. It is nice being close to nature but that's about it. Tech and nature. Not worth the CoL imo. I say this as someone who is from Chicago and lived in NYC for a long time, so I'm completely biased.