It's not nitpicking. It's an attempt to evaluate >whether his source is correct on the big picture or not (which cannot be verified), based on the details tha

It's not nitpicking. It's an attempt to evaluate >whether his source is correct on the big picture or not (which cannot be verified), based on the details that can be verified. >another investigative reporter who would travel for months to Florida, Norway, etc. and try to dig into the story. What would be one concrete specific claim that you'd try to dig into? >Who would dare that? The question of "why would someone want to bother" is still open for debate, and until that's settled, there's little use bringing in conspiratorial woo questions.