3 ms·
"complete shutdown of media coverage" is completely false, there were many stories in major US outlets that explicitly called out the possibility that the US di
by burkaman 4y ago
"complete shutdown of media coverage" is completely false, there were many stories in major US outlets that explicitly called out the possibility that the US did it.
- throwaway4good 4y agoI meant now; there was obviously media coverage when it happened.
- burkaman 4y agoI see. News organizations have a duty to corroborate claims like this before they publish them, so I would interpret the lack of coverage as other reporters being unable to verify anything he said. There is of course still some coverage though: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/prize-winning-reporter-seymour-hersh-no-stranger-controversy-2023-02-09/ https://www.reuters.com/world/us/prize-winning-reporter-seym..., https://www.newsweek.com/did-joe-biden-attack-russias-nord-stream-pipelines-1779948 https://www.newsweek.com/did-joe-biden-attack-russias-nord-s..., https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/us-bombed-nord-stream-gas-pipelines-claims-investigative-journalist-seymour-hersh-s730dnnfz https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/us-bombed-nord-stream-gas...