But it's also not like every scientist (vs environmentalist, can't we just stop with stupid generalization and classification like that?) would be in full suppo

But it's also not like every scientist (vs environmentalist, can't we just stop with stupid generalization and classification like that?) would be in full support of going on with nuclear as civil power source, and there is also more than pure science to consider. Stuff fails (from waste disposal processes to planes falling out of the sky) not because we have not understood the science or almost perfect processes established, but for many various reasons? I think it's also unfair to claim poster before as feeling attacked, and then giving statement about his beliefs, which you don't know. So could do the same thing here? Those grounded facts extrapolated to the complex practical reality is again itself just belief, and could do the same here then...