3 ms·

> I was surprised that [Eastlake and Montlake] just didn't have any grocery stores ... Given the amount of investment the city/state is making to improve the W

> I was surprised that [Eastlake and Montlake] just didn't have any grocery stores ... Given the amount of investment the city/state is making to improve the WA-520 corridor Montlake had a small grocery store that was torn down precisely because of the 520 construction. (I can't speak for Eastlake). 520 is a highway after all, and highways are hostile to walkability for a multitude or reasons. (this fact still remains, even though efforts are being made to improve the situation in Montlake).

chabons 4y ago
> Montlake had a small grocery store that was torn down precisely because of the 520 construction. Right, I forgot about the Montlake Market. That closed before my search, but I did hear about it. > 520 is a highway after all, and highways are hostile to walkability for a multitude or reasons Yeah, that's fair. I'd argue that 520 in it's final incarnation will be a little bit less hostile than most, as it's mostly over water, and the lids over the 2 land crossings (with parks + transit) will partially mitigate the walkability concerns. It'll still be a noisy eyesore though. Geographically, Montlake is in a pretty desirable location. It will have quick transit connections to downtown Seattle+SLU, UW (and light rail), and the eastside. I imagine the future only blocker to development will be zoning and pushback from existing residents.