3 ms·
No it didn't. The contractor market is very much alive and well in CA, and AB5 was an obvious clarification targeting contractor-in-name-only type gigs. Of cou
by OkayPhysicist 4y ago
No it didn't. The contractor market is very much alive and well in CA, and AB5 was an obvious clarification targeting contractor-in-name-only type gigs. Of course the main target of the bill, Uber/Lyft drivers ended up getting shafted after the ignorant public passed prop 22, but a software contractor/freelancer would have had no issues passing the contractor vs. employee test specified in AB5.
- SamReidHughes 4y agoThat's not really true; AB 2257, passed later, fixed some important issues with section 2776.