4 ms·
The molnupiravir development story is a nice case example of what's gone wrong under the corporatization of American academics. The drug came out of reseach do
by photochemsyn 4y ago
The molnupiravir development story is a nice case example of what's gone wrong under the corporatization of American academics. The drug came out of reseach done at Emory University, funded by US federal agency NIAID, as their PR blurb reports:
> "The discovery of molnupiravir at Emory was supported in part by funding from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the Defense Threat Reduction Agency. (Dec 23 2021, Emory press release)."
The university then did the usual thing in these cases, i.e. the researchers involved set up a small biotech company (Ridgeback Biotherapeutics) which was then acquired by Merck. This was made possible by US Bayh-Dole law from the 1980s, which allows universities like Emory to exclusively license taxpayer-finaced research to private entities, instead of allowing anyone to develop it.
The U.S. government then dumped an initial $1.2 billion into purchases, followed by another $1 billion more recently, a little over a year ago:
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-government-buy-14-mln-more-courses-mercks-covid-19-pill-2021-11-09/ https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-government-buy-14-mln-mo...
Despite 'promising clinical trial results' (which may or may not have been manipulated to give good outcomes), in reality the drug seems to be of relatively little benefit, only slightly decreasing length of illness and with no effect on death or hospitalization rates (Dec 2022 study in BMJ):
> "No benefit was seen in terms of hospital admissions or death rates. The group treated with molnupiravir had 105 cases of death or hospital admission (0.8%), and the control group had 98 cases of death or hospital admission (also 0.8%)."
> "The median average length of illness in patients who took molnupiravir was nine days, which compared with 15 days in the control group. After adjusting for other factors the study authors found that patients taking molnupiravir recovered 4.2 days more quickly than patients in the control group."
https://www.bmj.com/content/379/bmj.o3055 https://www.bmj.com/content/379/bmj.o3055
Incidentally, and anecdotally, I came down with a fairly solid case of Covid-19 a year ago, and the cheap over-the-counter medication, diphenhydramine (Benadryl being the most well-known brand) knocked down my symptoms very effectively. This seems to bear out in research, although of course the U.S. government isn't going to fork over $2 billion to acquire a supply, and this drug is long out of patent (with a good safety record, though I did end up taking one tablet every 3 hours or so, a bit more than recommended). YMMV - but this is not an ivermectin-type claim:
https://ufhealth.org/news/2021/two-common-compounds-show-effectiveness-against-covid-19-virus-early-testing https://ufhealth.org/news/2021/two-common-compounds-show-eff...
The whole molnupiravir story reeks of academic corruption, government contracting kickbacks, pharmaceutical profit-seeking, abuse of the clinical trial process, etc. It also reveals why researchers have little incentive to examine out-of-patent drugs as treatments for emerging diseases.
- cheaprentalyeti 4y agoIf they're capable of ignoring benadryl, they're capable of creating fraudulent studies about ivermectin too. The first fraudulent studies right off the bat were the HCQ study and the ACE inhibitor study from Surgisphere, with completely fabricated data. People can't make the jump to looking at the other HCQ (or other drug studies) because, well, Trump, but they also did this with ACE inhibitors, despite the other studies showing a positive effect. You need to be asking yourself: why weren't antihistamines part of the standard of care for COVID, when they were part of the standard of care for all forms of viral pneumonia back in 2016? (Sorry, that's the most recent time period when I had what my doctor at the time thought was viral pneumonia.) Why the Year Zero stuff?
- Dr_Birdbrain 4y agoWhat is the Year Zero stuff?
- strbean 4y ago[Tangent warning] I recall some scare awhile back about a possible link between diphenhydramine and dementia / Alzheimer's. Googling turns up a study from 2008. Anyone know if that held water, or if there is ongoing research into that link? I've generally avoided the drug since hearing about that, but I used it much in the first place.
- dangoor 4y agoThis has references newer than 2008: https://www.alzdiscovery.org/uploads/cognitive_vitality_media/Diphenhydramine-Cognitive-Vitality-For-Researchers.pdf https://www.alzdiscovery.org/uploads/cognitive_vitality_medi... At the top, it talks about "long term use", so it may be okay under acute circumstances.
- Baeocystin 4y agoAnticholinergics are associated with an increase of risk of dementia, and diphenhydramine is a pretty strong one, considering its OTC nature. I still use it occasionally myself, but I agree that it's a good idea not to take on a regular basis. Here's a paper from 2019 that covers this: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2736353 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullar...