3 ms·
> the source is very much still open You're mixing up open-source with visible-source or source-available.
by josephcsible 4y ago
> the source is very much still open
You're mixing up open-source with visible-source or source-available.
- tsimionescu 4y agoNot exactly. I explicitly noted that they are no longer FOSS, but I beleive its wrong to call them "closed-source". If parent had said "they are no longer open source", I wouldn't have commented this at all, since "open source" and FOSS are essentially synonyms. But the antonym of FOSS/open source is not "closed source".