3 ms·
It’s certainly your prerogative to not find it interesting and your feelings are valid. However, I think it’s interesting and can’t wait to see more djs and ev
by prepend 4y ago
It’s certainly your prerogative to not find it interesting and your feelings are valid.
However, I think it’s interesting and can’t wait to see more djs and even new artists using this technique to create some neat art. And of course, it looks like there are tens of thousands of fans in that stadium who seemed kind of interesting.
I don’t think statistical sanity is a good measure for value, especially art, but I don’t think it’s noteworthy that you don’t find it interesting.
- thatswrong0 4y agoI understand that. But he's making a big deal out of using literally the two easiest tools out there to generate... a tiny awkward two second soundbite in a set. I just timed myself and it took me less than two minutes to do the same thing. Might take longer if you need to sign up first. And this isn't to say that the time it takes to do something is important - the idea of course matters too. But the idea itself isn't original. And the result is just a TINY soundbite. So it's just straight up not interesting from a production nor listening perspective, especially given the fact there are people out there doing much more creative, involved, and interesting things in the realm of AI assisted production. For example: https://twitter.com/thisiscyclops/status/1619085469198721038?s=20 https://twitter.com/thisiscyclops/status/1619085469198721038... If David Guetta wasn't a big DJ, no one would care about this.