18 ms·
I would understand properly why S3 isn't a viable option before going down the rabbit hole of trying to roll your own distributed file store. > I'd guess so t
by tlonny 4y ago
I would understand properly why S3 isn't a viable option before going down the rabbit hole of trying to roll your own distributed file store.
> I'd guess so there's no accidents where if one vigilant user decides to delete the contents or change them so the file could be compared by a hash
This risk can be easily mitigated using S3 permissions/access controls.
- Gigachad 4y agoAgreed. Tens of terabytes is fine in S3. Sure, it’s expensive, but so is every other solution. S3 removes the headaches for you.