3 ms·
Terabytes, later growing into 10s of terabytes, as a lot of those images got either deleted or stay at the specific university machines. I actually don't know,
by adezxc 4y ago
Terabytes, later growing into 10s of terabytes, as a lot of those images got either deleted or stay at the specific university machines. I actually don't know, I'd guess so there's no accidents where if one vigilant user decides to delete the contents or change them so the file could be compared by a hash.
- tlonny 4y agoI would understand properly why S3 isn't a viable option before going down the rabbit hole of trying to roll your own distributed file store. > I'd guess so there's no accidents where if one vigilant user decides to delete the contents or change them so the file could be compared by a hash This risk can be easily mitigated using S3 permissions/access controls.
- Gigachad 4y agoAgreed. Tens of terabytes is fine in S3. Sure, it’s expensive, but so is every other solution. S3 removes the headaches for you.