Ignoring the philosophical discussion, one thing that ChatGPT lacks is the fact that I absolutely have to be able to independently verify the results in the con

Ignoring the philosophical discussion, one thing that ChatGPT lacks is the fact that I absolutely have to be able to independently verify the results in the context of my intended application, whereas with my favorite YouTube cooking channel I can trust that it's good enough and move on with my day. There's no grounding in reality. Addressing the philosophy a little, it's pretty damning when the AI fails at extremely basic logical tasks. If even logical primitives are broken, how could it possibly prove to itself, much less to us, that its more complicated ideas are true? That still sidesteps what it means to "know" something, but I think it's a meaningful prerequisite.