3 ms·
“Depress salaries” == “Now the person in the middle of Nebraska can make more than he could make before without moving to California”
by scarface74 4y ago
“Depress salaries” == “Now the person in the middle of Nebraska can make more than he could make before without moving to California”
- ChuckNorris89 4y agoMaybe the HN fear of "depress salaries" isn't someone from Nebraska taking Cali tech jobs, but could be most likely a dog whistle for foreigners from abroad taking US tech jobs. I don't live there anymore but in my home county in Eastern Europe, the WFH boom from 2020 brought in thousands of well paying tech jobs from US companies which might have never arrived if not for Covid. Tech workers there are making bank now, relative to local CoL. Who knows, maybe this trend will accelerate now that the tap of zero interest money which enabled companie to out-bid each other for SV labor has dried out and many start-up and scale-ups need to actually be profitable for a change, they might look towards skilled remote workers abroad to fill their ranks till the next bull run. Interesting times ahead indeed.
- robertcope 4y agoI 100% think this is the long term play. Once we figure out how to really have "remote only" companies, the "remote" part won't be "remote in the USA" but "remote in some cheap part of the world". We tried this with outsourcing but it failed because we didn't have the "remote" part down... now we do...
- berkeleyjunk 4y agoYes. Agree. The only thing preventing this going all the way is the friction in timezones and difficulty in co-ordination (i.e. still requires someone local to the remote people to manage their work).
- scarface74 4y agoWell for my line of work (app dev/cloud consulting) there is lot of face time, video conferencing with clients, travel to client sites, etc. But also many of our contracts have data governance requirements where you have to be US based and other government contracts require you to be a US citizen.
- ChuckNorris89 4y agoNon-government, international start-ups won't have any of these restrictions.
- rswail 4y agoAs someone that has dealt with local (Australia) and remote (Slovakia, Mumbai, Phillipines, Thailand) outsourcing, the problem is not the individual workers, or even language, time zones etc. The problem is more about the company/organization that is doing the outsourcing than the outsourced work itself. You have to have a clear definition of what you are trying to outsource. Is it "just coding"? Is it "some design, but not analysis"? Is it "do everything below a certain level of management" (the worst)? If you don't know what you want other than "cheap" then you won't get either of the other two qualities of "good" or "quick". Developers aren't fungible, neither are designers, or analysts or architects. About the only people that are fungible and easily replaceable are project managers (sorry, buzzword compliant "product owners" and "SAFe scaled Agile practitioners").
- sokoloff 4y agoI don’t think it’s a dog whistle at all (nor does it need to be). Drawing from a worldwide pool of capable technologists is pretty obviously the end state and, unless global demand picks up by a factor of over 10x, that will inevitably depress tech salaries in the currently most highly compensated markets (while raising salaries on the other end of the distribution).
- Rumel57 4y agoOh hey this is literally me. Started working remote in 2015 and really upped my salary in 2020 working for AWS remotely and then moved to an actual good company. Never had to move to California or Washington.
- scarface74 4y agoI actually work for AWS remotely (ProServe).
- Rumel57 4y agoSorry to hear that. Haha. Nah, it's very org dependent. A bunch of my team all quit around the same time last year. One of my buddies had been happily there for 6 years.