3 ms·
People are not complaining that they are not paid for the period they are working. They are complaining that participating in the strike has revoked their tuiti
by oneoff786 4y ago
People are not complaining that they are not paid for the period they are working. They are complaining that participating in the strike has revoked their tuition remission for the entire semester. Idiot leader. This will play out incredibly poorly. Grad students put up with more than they ought to already.
- luckylion 4y agoWould you still get equity grants and bonuses if you went on strike while working at a normal company?
- Spivak 4y agoIf they had already been paid out, yes. Company bought you a $10k car in January, you strike in March. The company isn’t allowed to retroactively “unbuy” the car and declare that you now owe them $10k. Even if the condition for keeping the car was a full year’s employment you can’t take it — striking isn’t legally quitting. Even stronger, if employees usually get an annual bonus but the year of the strike they don’t you might get bitten for retaliation.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- oneoff786 4y agoI feel like yes, you would get options in your contract. But it doesn’t matter. The legality of this isn’t why it’s stupid. It’s the immense bad will from a class of poor students that are already doing a ton of work for very little. They would effectively now be asking students to pay to work. Organized labor is coming for grad students.
- munk-a 4y agoIf you had been issued options to buy shares that had already vested it'd be pretty insane for a company to try and claw those back. Pausing the vesting schedule might be a bit more understandable but is honestly pretty damn petty for what you're getting unless the strike lasted a good chunk of the year.