They didn't keep the features that mattered to you and implemented this badly on top of it. Of course it's bad. Okay, that's a tangent, but if done well, new b

They didn't keep the features that mattered to you and implemented this badly on top of it. Of course it's bad. Okay, that's a tangent, but if done well, new buildings should be better because we improved on many plans. At the campus in which I studied, 70s buildings are mostly ugly and badly isolated (done quickly all at the same time because they were needed quickly, standards of back then, also fairly solid). Cold in winter, hot in summer, quite dark inside overall at least for the corridors. They did a decent job for the new buildings. Rooms still have the same number of people. Those buildings are rented for 30 years costing a lot to the university but they are better overall. So, yeah. In both cases, new stuff can be better but of course it needs to be well done, stuff that matter need to be there and users listened.