3 ms·
I think that it could shine in integrations. Maybe. (Voice chat) - LLM, find three articles from HN frontpage which I would find insightful based on my recent
by wruza 4y ago
I think that it could shine in integrations. Maybe.
(Voice chat)
- LLM, find three articles from HN frontpage which I would find insightful based on my recent evaluations, summarize them in under half a minute each and then I’ll choose the order, while I commute.
- (…)
- Okay, read me a second one first.
- (…)
- That was a good one because well-written and compared alternatives. Now find funniest article of all time based on my long-time preferences.
- (…)
- - -
While it’s dumb enough to forget what and how you’ve evaluated recently, a hidden prompt could(?) fetch that out, e.g.:
- (system) please convert my previous article ratings into json objects consisting of article url, article id (…how to get it…), 1..10 rating, your summary and a string of tags.
Then these ratings may be saved for later and fed into a chat secretly as:
- (system) If I gave you this prompt: “<voice prompt>” and had data looking like this “<db schema>”, please list which tables and filters would you likely use to form an answer.
- (…)
- My recent ratings were (…). <voice prompt>
- - -
I have no clue if this could work, but if it does, well, that would be useful.
Edit: it may be wrong, but we have enough mundane tasks which are better done wrong rather than not done at all. It has a great potential as an “occasionally bright secretary” archetype.