3 ms·
woah, let's not go crazy here. Just making the offer binding with, say, a 6 month window is eminently doable and still still be incredibly expensive to the ISP
by idiotsecant 4y ago
woah, let's not go crazy here. Just making the offer binding with, say, a 6 month window is eminently doable and still still be incredibly expensive to the ISP in some cases. making the timeframe ultra short is not going to do anything other than make it an impossible bar. There is a lot of planning an approvals from municipalities, landowners, utilities, etc that goes into that sort of thing.
- Already__Taken 4y agoplus actually solving the problem
- mjevans 4y agoThis is effectively lying under oath to the US Government as well as prospective consumers. How would you feel if a city advertised that Water and Sewer service were available at a given property, only to find that there weren't even mains anywhere nearby or that even if there were they were already 'at capacity' and you wouldn't be authorized to hook up? That's the sort of data that drives rejection of sale.
- genocidicbunny 4y ago> than make it an impossible bar. Absolutely not. They could just not lie in the first place, then there's no 'bar' to meet.