4 ms·

Great results on the first attempt I did. When I wanted to export the result in highest available resolution, it asked me to subscribe for $5/month. I only nee

by dt3ft 4y ago

Great results on the first attempt I did. When I wanted to export the result in highest available resolution, it asked me to subscribe for $5/month. I only need 1 single screenshot, so I’m not going to subscribe, but I can see this being used by big newspaper companies. Good luck with your project!

mikaelaast 4y ago
OP here. Thanks, that's good to hear. I got journalists at a couple of the big newspaper players here in my country (Norway) to purchase subscriptions, and after seeing these pop up in articles rather often, I felt that I had sold myself short with the $5 monthly fee. One of them (VG.no), is like the 2nd biggest site in Norway, with 70 million visits a month. I guess I'm bad at business.
- cloudking 4y ago
  I think the insight here is you should offer a pay-per-use model too.
- mensetmanusman 4y ago
  Personal / business tier pricing
- movedx 4y ago
  It's the wrong pricing model, in my opinion. consider the following: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwXlo9gy_k4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwXlo9gy_k4 & https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWZbWzAyHAE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWZbWzAyHAE
- radiojasper 4y ago
  Took me 2 scrolls to find an image probably generated by your tool. https://www.tek.no/nyheter/nyhet/i/KnWn0G/ai-flause-for-google-fikk-store-konsekvenser https://www.tek.no/nyheter/nyhet/i/KnWn0G/ai-flause-for-goog... You probably should make a personal account which limits the amount of images you can generate a month (10?) and a business account which offers unlimited generation but for a steep price.
  - Galanwe 4y ago
    Or maybe allow free usage with an added watermark. So that people can try it out on their own screenshot, eventually distribute them internally, and pay when they need to remove the watermark for public distribution.
    - icelancer 4y ago
      I think that's how the SD basic tool works.
- nextaccountic 4y ago
  $5/yr is too much for the casual user and too little for big newspapersq
  - boguscoder 4y ago
    Nit: It’s 5/mo not per year

by dt3ft 4y ago

mikaelaast 4y ago

OP here. Thanks, that's good to hear. I got journalists at a couple of the big newspaper players here in my country (Norway) to purchase subscriptions, and after seeing these pop up in articles rather often, I felt that I had sold myself short with the $5 monthly fee. One of them (VG.no), is like the 2nd biggest site in Norway, with 70 million visits a month. I guess I'm bad at business.

cloudking 4y ago
I think the insight here is you should offer a pay-per-use model too.
mensetmanusman 4y ago
Personal / business tier pricing
movedx 4y ago
It's the wrong pricing model, in my opinion. consider the following: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwXlo9gy_k4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwXlo9gy_k4 & https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWZbWzAyHAE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWZbWzAyHAE
radiojasper 4y ago
Took me 2 scrolls to find an image probably generated by your tool. https://www.tek.no/nyheter/nyhet/i/KnWn0G/ai-flause-for-google-fikk-store-konsekvenser https://www.tek.no/nyheter/nyhet/i/KnWn0G/ai-flause-for-goog... You probably should make a personal account which limits the amount of images you can generate a month (10?) and a business account which offers unlimited generation but for a steep price.
- Galanwe 4y ago
  Or maybe allow free usage with an added watermark. So that people can try it out on their own screenshot, eventually distribute them internally, and pay when they need to remove the watermark for public distribution.
  - icelancer 4y ago
    I think that's how the SD basic tool works.
nextaccountic 4y ago
$5/yr is too much for the casual user and too little for big newspapersq
- boguscoder 4y ago
  Nit: It’s 5/mo not per year