I'd seen references to possible standards issues with dynamic linking, but hadn't really thought about it until you pointed it out: taking the address of a func

I'd seen references to possible standards issues with dynamic linking, but hadn't really thought about it until you pointed it out: taking the address of a function or data object with linkage is no longer naturally returns the same address in different translation units. Believe it or not, in C++ a pointer to an object or function is valid as a non-type template parameter. Heck, I bet you can even partially specialize on it.