I'm sure dedicated people can be more creative than to just do ANOM 7 times but I do get your point. Anyway, I realized after I wrote the comment that ANOM is

I'm sure dedicated people can be more creative than to just do ANOM 7 times but I do get your point. Anyway, I realized after I wrote the comment that ANOM is a bad example for arguing in favor of ubiquitous end-to-end encryption (E2EE). ANOM is only attractive to criminal organizations because other forms of "E2EE" are not resilient to government snooping. It's kind of an interesting point but I do personally land on a preference for ubiquitous E2EE. Ultimately, I suspect the resources of law enforcement would win out given enough creativity from officers but, unfortunately, the current ecosystem does not require them to be creative.