i'm sure there's some of this, but it doesn't seem like the broader trend. if they were really laying off the bottom 10% there wouldn't be so many stories of m

i'm sure there's some of this, but it doesn't seem like the broader trend. if they were really laying off the bottom 10% there wouldn't be so many stories of managers complaining about their direct reports being laid off without any advance warning. it's hard to pick out low performers in any sort of sane way if you're not even asking managers who their low performers are.