4 ms·
> Not everyone has a 16:9 monitor, so super wide views don’t work for me. I'd say that you're in a small enough minority that most people will design right pas
by _cenw 4y ago
> Not everyone has a 16:9 monitor, so super wide views don’t work for me.
I'd say that you're in a small enough minority that most people will design right past you, just like most websites have an acceptable minimum percentage of browser feature availability after which you can make that feature a requirement for functionality.
Especially as screens tend to get wider, not thinner.
- throwawayapples 4y agoI see what you're saying, but wouldn't it be also great if there was a mail app that didn't consume the entire screen real estate.
- throw0101a 4y ago> that didn't consume the entire screen real estate. If you want something really small, perhaps mutt in a terminal could work. :)
- mixmastamyk 4y agoLots of screens are getting squarer again. Macs are 16:10+, my framework and MS surface are 3:2. And a few portrait folks.
- _cenw 4y agoBut usually that's just an extension upward, pixel density wide.