4 ms·
The problem is that its very top heavy and is not well done, has lots of UI bugs and really is a pain to work with
by widowlark 4y ago
The problem is that its very top heavy and is not well done, has lots of UI bugs and really is a pain to work with
- vikram2784 4y agoTotally agree. MS Teams is super agonizing to work with.
- axlee 4y agoFor meetings, calls, screensharing, and scheduling it's superior to Slack in every single way. Written experience is worse though. If only Slack spent a month writing a "Schedule a meeting with those people, and add the meeting with a link to everyone's calendar" feature, they would be on par.
- jrochkind1 4y agoOne reason Slack maybe doens't, is nobody actually chooses Teams over Slack because of feature set. They choose Teams over Slack because it's "good enough" and included with Office360 which they already have. Meeting Teams feature set may not actually get Slack any more customers at all.
- axlee 4y agoWe do use Teams and Slack, Teams for scheduled meetings and Slack for everything else, just because Slack's scheduling is non-existent while something great comes out of the box from Teams (and yes, also because we get it "for free" through O365, and wouldn't be paying for Zoom). We wouldn't have to deal with Teams if Slack upped their game.
- persedes 4y agoOn par won't be enough for slack though if teams comes"for free" with your existing office subscription.