3 ms·
to be clear my point wasnt about maxima, but about imbalance. IMO Rejecting someone preventative care ($1k tops), when they give $18K to the system is a broken
by maerF0x0 4y ago
to be clear my point wasnt about maxima, but about imbalance.
IMO Rejecting someone preventative care ($1k tops), when they give $18K to the system is a broken balance. The claim/demand is not $18K in, $18K out.
- fennecfoxy 4y agoOh, definitely agree with you there, then. I guess it is troublesome because the money has to come from somewhere at the end of the day. Someone like that shouldn't be denied but I guess it begs the question of what happens if in a certain year demand for medical services outstrips allocated tax. I suppose govs should really have a slush fund for that sort of thing rather than national debt/constantly feeling they have to spend all tax money, every year.