4 ms·
Might it be, in part, due to moving to newer versions of Firefox or Firefox-derived components under the hood? When Thunderbird was starting out, Firefox would
by yamtaddle 4y ago
Might it be, in part, due to moving to newer versions of Firefox or Firefox-derived components under the hood? When Thunderbird was starting out, Firefox would have had something like a 10-15Mb memory footprint with no pages loaded and eaten approximately zero processor cycles while idle. It's, um, a lot bigger and hungrier now.
- mmcgaha 4y agoI have never used thunderbird but I am sure a lot changed when when xul went away.
- notpushkin 4y agoXUL is still there. Even in Firefox, the UI is still powered by XUL – it's just not exposed to addons anymore: https://u.ale.sh/there-is-only-xul.png https://u.ale.sh/there-is-only-xul.png
- efreak 4y agoThey were slowly working away on it until sometime last year. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ORqed8SW_7fPnPdjfz42RoGfWH5Gn4RMKKFPaPrGpZo/edit https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ORqed8SW_7fPnPdjfz42RoGf... https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1446335 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1446335 https://arewexblstill.com/ https://arewexblstill.com/