4 ms·
Teams for video, not so bad. If they were replacing Slack with Teams, that would be horrible.
by corndoge 4y ago
Teams for video, not so bad. If they were replacing Slack with Teams, that would be horrible.
- bhouston 4y agoTeams isn't that bad overall compared to Slack these days.
- jjeaff 4y agoSurely they are just trying to gradually switch everything to Teams. Seems weird to use a slack clone for video chat only but continue to use slack for the chat.
- robryan 4y agoIsn't it more the scheduling of meetings? Does slack have a reasonable way to schedule huddles and integrate them with calendars? My company does scheduled meetings on teams and everything else on slack.
- shagie 4y ago> ii) We will be moving to Microsoft Teams for the sole purpose of video conferencing, saving significant cost and simplifying cross-company and customer conversations. This move will be complete by September 1, 2023. We will remain on Slack as our day-to-day collaboration tool.
- chrisandchris 4y agoI really love when one brings in more tools. So let's use Slack for text, Teams for audio and Zoom for video. It's like most people forgot that in the early days there was a phone and it worked just perfect. Everyone was reachable through it. Now I need to check multiple channels for the same thing.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- corndoge 4y agoYes, that is what I was replying to.