> All that said, using the word "only" as you did indicates a certain level of economic ignorance. I wasn't using "only" to say it's cheap from some absolute p

> All that said, using the word "only" as you did indicates a certain level of economic ignorance. I wasn't using "only" to say it's cheap from some absolute perspective, just that it's way cheaper than was claimed. For example, if someone says an Airbus A320 costs about $500,000,000, it's not economically ignorant to respond that no, it "only" costs about $100,000,000.