2 ms·
> ... so low in responsiveness that it's literally quicker for me to open a new tab [and] load Google Mail Might have to do with us having allowed to infest ma
by tannhaeuser 4y ago
> ... so low in responsiveness that it's literally quicker for me to open a new tab [and] load Google Mail
Might have to do with us having allowed to infest mail, like so many other things, with the piece of shit that is CSS. As it's formulated, it would indeed appear gross, but coming to think about it, it's no wonder that loading a document into an already running browser is faster than starting a web browser albatross afresh.
Maybe embedding (and keeping up to date with security band aids) an old Moz browser is the problem, but I don't remember performance to be as much as a problem when I was still using Thunderbird. I was glad it existed and hope their rewrite goes well.
- SketchySeaBeast 4y ago> Might have to do with us having allowed to infest mail, like so many other things, with the piece of shit that is CSS. Wouldn't that only make sense if your Gmail tab wasn't also loading up the same CSS?
- jeltz 4y agoNope, the issues seem to lie more in just plain bad code. It is seems to be mostly their IMAP code and their mbox code which goes crazy and starts using all CPU, not the UI. The issues happen when opening folders too.