4 ms·
> men who domestically abuse their wives > known abusive husband Not sure what you’re referring to here. If you’re analogizing what Biden said with domestic a
by bandyaboot 4y ago
> men who domestically abuse their wives
> known abusive husband
Not sure what you’re referring to here. If you’re analogizing what Biden said with domestic abuse, that’s just ridiculous. It’s more akin to telling the wife they’re going to need to divorce if she doesn’t stop threatening the children. If you’re saying the US in general has a history of doing things that could be compared to domestic abuse, sure, but so could all parties involved, particularly Russia. So we’re back at square one.
- vintermann 4y agoI knew you would take offense at the comparison. But it's not a comparison, it's just an example of the same statistical dishonesty. When the pipeline was in fact blown up, of course we're going to look at vaguely worded threats in another light.
- bandyaboot 4y ago> I knew you would take offense at the comparison. I was stating my opinion that the comparison was of low intellectual quality, not taking offense. > When the pipeline was in fact blown up, of course we're going to look at vaguely worded threats in another light. Except it’s only vaguely worded if you’re approaching it from the bias of wanting to think it was a threat of blowing it up. Approaching it a different way, they’re just the words a person would use if they were talking about ending the project, not literally blowing it up. If Biden were going to be so aggressive as to threaten to blow up an infrastructure project of a close ally, why specifically limit it to Nordstream 2? “We’re going to lose our ever-loving minds here, but only for phase 2 of the project”.
- tarboreus 4y agoHow would Biden "end the project?" Say pretty please?