4 ms·
Giving people the option to work remotely is objectively better, because it satisfies both parties.
by horns4lyfe 4y ago
Giving people the option to work remotely is objectively better, because it satisfies both parties.
- nprateem 4y agoWell it's not because there's no point going to the office if your team still WFHs
- malermeister 4y agoSo you think the solution is to force a bunch of people to hang out with you? I'm sure they'd be thrilled to stop doing what worked for them so as to please you.
- nprateem 4y agoSuch a tired, lazy retort. Why is there always this false dichotomy?
- malermeister 4y agoHow is it a false dichotomy? People are either allowed to stay home or not. I don't wanna be forced to go in so other people can feel good about me being there.
- nprateem 4y agoWhy don't we ask people what their preferences are and organise teams accordingly? People who prefer remote can work with others remotely, while those who prefer more time in the office could work with others who'd prefer that. Ok not all teams could be reorganised, but I expect in reality a lot could be shuffled around.
- horns4lyfe 4y agoSo why did you object to my statement that giving people the choice is better for both parties? You’re suggesting the same thing.