3 ms·
A major thing I find lacking in search engines is a way to disambiguate between homographs. "AI" search engines are one way to implement that capability. Howeve
by foobarbecue 4y ago
A major thing I find lacking in search engines is a way to disambiguate between homographs. "AI" search engines are one way to implement that capability. However, I want a search engine that gives me websites as a result, and is not capable of lying to me. So far every single "AI" search I have tried has given me incorrect, invented answers. This is a big step in the wrong direction.
- esperent 4y agoUnlike normal search engines which give you SEO tuned spam about 50% of the time. Are you sure it's a step in the wrong direction? > every single "AI" search I have tried has given me incorrect, invented answers. Really? Every single one? Not a single AI (ChatGPT, presumably) query you've tried has given you anything except incorrect information? What kind of things have you been querying for?
- visarga 4y agoInteresting point - what is the noise in each one of them: - chatGPT - 10% hallucination - Google - 50% spam Which is better - the "honest hallucination" from AI or the "spam for profit" human operation?
- reportgunner 4y agoIs google really only 50% spam and is chatgpt only 10% hallucination ?
- xxs 4y ago10% is on the very low side of things
- JohnFen 4y agoIgnoring the percentages and just taking your question alone, I prefer the spam. It's easy to spot the spam. It's harder to spot the hallucination.