well, it would be weirdly too specific if the conversation didn't lead to it, but it did. "how did this happen? > Bugs were found in windows systems which all

well, it would be weirdly too specific if the conversation didn't lead to it, but it did. "how did this happen? > Bugs were found in windows systems which allowed this. "can you not fix those?" > we can. "why didn't you fix them?" > We did, the patches have been available for months in the worst case. "then why are computers running your operating system still affected?" > Because users have not downloaded and applied the patches. "why not? are they not encouraged to do so?" > We make them available but a user must choose to do it. "Why do you not force this? This seems like an easy way to address the issue of unpatched operating systems." > We cannot control what the users of our operating systems do. "Not good enough. Clearly your current stance is not sufficient given the state of the Internet right now." > Ok. ======== Very much paraphrased, but that's how I remember it going. I watched the thing live on C-SPAN and I don't know if it was blogged about anywhere. Even then the internet hated Microsoft even though most of its users ran Windows.