> would be one that did not draw conclusions but simply replied with the links relevant Thats neglecting the facts that humans lie and are opaque as well. You

> would be one that did not draw conclusions but simply replied with the links relevant Thats neglecting the facts that humans lie and are opaque as well. You never know when a "reputable" person will stop being reputable. How ML vets its sources is going to be the relevant question going forward. While MLs are black boxes, their objectives and measures are not, and the companies should make them transparent. After all, it is only going to increase trust to their systems