3 ms·
You're correct. And we will question it, rightfully so. The days of these people being "independent" media and bloggers are over. They may have been at one p
by tatsuke95 15y ago
You're correct. And we will question it, rightfully so.
The days of these people being "independent" media and bloggers are over. They may have been at one point, but these are cash generating vehicles, designed to promote product. And, really, I don't blame them.
But let's be realistic. She started what appears to be a blog. Why is there a laundry list of the who's-who of SV investing in it?
- obiterdictum 15y agoWhy is it a bad thing? I think any site doing startup coverage needs to publish the list of its investors as a disclaimer.
- spwmoni 15y agoIt's not the publishing of the list that the commenter's questioning, but the fact that they've invested in it in the first place.
- diego 15y agoJust look at one of their first posts. One would think they could have waited a while before running a blatant ad for one of their sister companies. http://pandodaily.com/2012/01/16/wealthfront-the-antidote-to-the-wealth-management-zombies/ http://pandodaily.com/2012/01/16/wealthfront-the-antidote-to...