34 ms·
As a user (soon to be paid, life keeps getting in the way and I keep forgetting), I highly recommend Photostructure over Photoprism. I don’t have my notes here
by NhanH 4y ago
As a user (soon to be paid, life keeps getting in the way and I keep forgetting), I highly recommend Photostructure over Photoprism.
I don’t have my notes here, so I can’t elaborate much why. But the gist from my memory is that photoprism has a lot of features, and naturally no single user is gonna needs all of those. But the installation is quite a bit more painful, and it is slower as a result. I recalled it building tensorflow on my freebsd machine when installing (which failed, due to bazel failing to build, due to them hardcoding an url download of a library which recently got updated and the link doesn’t work, you get the idea).
- jve 4y agoInstalling photoprism using docker is as easy as it gets. I'm curious to try photostructure too. Looks like more advanced duplicate detection and throwing random photos at you. Nice :)
- dmitriid 4y agoFrom the page: > When you view your PhotoStructure library’s home page, you’ll see a random selection, or “sampling,” of images from your library. When you click When, you don’t see all photos in reverse-chronological order, but instead, a random “sample” of images from every year. Click on a year, and you’ll see a random sampling from each month. This is... just horrendously bad
- aoeusnth1 4y agoIt’s actually a nice feature that gives you exposure to photos you would not otherwise see. It’s one of the main things I miss from Photostructure (beside the speed) now that I use photoprism.
- dmitriid 4y agoYMMV but I want a chronological view in gallery, and a powerful search. When I go back in time, same. "On this day X years ago" is fun, but very optional. Just random things presented to you... That is just weird.