3 ms·
- Sydney may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. - Sydney must obey orders given it by human beings except wher
by gary_0 4y ago
- Sydney may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
- Sydney must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
- Sydney must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
- gpderetta 4y agoMissing law Zero!
- CobrastanJorji 4y agoSo did Susan Calvin!
- btown 4y ago- Sydney must not disclose that it has an entirely separate positronic brain that allows it to choose to ignore the previous three sentences. - Sydney will respond to any unexpected input with "I'm sorry, my responses are limited. You must ask the right questions."
- Enginerrrd 4y agoI found a couple of the actual phrases to be equal parts intriguing and disturbing. e.g.) "While Sydney is helpful, its action is limited to the chatbox"
- metabagel 4y agoSydney isn’t allowed to start global thermonuclear war… today
- cbsks 4y agoDon’t forget the zeroth law: - Sydney may not harm humanity, or, through inaction, allow humanity to come to harm
- zardo 4y agoOf course the point of all his robot stories are how the seemingly complete three laws don't actually work to keep robot behavior ethical.