> Wrong. Sorry. You are out of date with the science on this. Which science has updated this conclusion? > Weasel-wording like "every reputable study" can't

> Wrong. Sorry. You are out of date with the science on this. Which science has updated this conclusion? > Weasel-wording like "every reputable study" can't change that. Is that a civil way to word things? And why call me a weasel, if one sentence earlier you charitably assumed I was simply out of date? > Did you even look at the linked study? Which one - The one you linked? No, I'm not paying $62 to see how they did their review. The vatican radio thing linked by someone else? Yeah, I did. I replied to the guy who posted it with what I perceive to be some flaws in that study. If you want to discuss it civilly, I'd be interested in that. But not if you're gonna bring this reddit-style "screw you for being wrong" kind of energy.