4 ms·
Last time I posted someone asked this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25368352 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25368352 The TL;DR is that "raw foota
by wilg 4y ago
Last time I posted someone asked this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25368352 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25368352
The TL;DR is that "raw footage" is sort of meaningless with video. You could make the comparison look as good or bad as you want.
- deaddodo 4y agoIt’s most definitely not “meaningless”. Your point is a semi fair one if you’re talking objective data; however, we have a general reference point and neutral space to refer to. If you want to continue to be obtuse, you can use the same colorspace/LUT that any generic phone camera is tuned to.
- fooker 4y ago> any generic phone camera is tuned to That's not how it works lmao
- deaddodo 4y agoThat's exactly how it works. Take your source digital image/video, run it through a neutral DCI-P3 output LUT and you have exactly what people are asking for as a "before" video. Pretending image mastering and color correction is incomprehensible doesn't make it so.
- wilg 4y agoYou may download Filmbox Lite for free and compare it in any way you wish. We have an opinion on it based on our deep understanding of this subject matter.
- deaddodo 4y ago> We have an opinion on it based on our deep understanding of this subject matter. It doesn't sound that deep nor that well reasoned of an opinion. For that reason, I won't try your software nor will I recommend it to anyone.
- wilg 4y agoOK!
- ihateyouall123 4y agoDamn you just came in here and lost people to your product. Perhaps a good time to get off HN?