4 ms·
It seems people miss the most occupies obvious part about this. F-droid is not limited to free software. So the whole chain out the argument is moot. They usual
by rjzzleep 4y ago
It seems people miss the most occupies obvious part about this. F-droid is not limited to free software. So the whole chain out the argument is moot. They usually get a label.
- rsynnott 4y ago… Wait, really? I thought that was the whole point of it.
- mid-kid 4y agoThe commenter might be alluding to how f-droid allows adding additional repositories that may contain proprietary apps. However, that's completely irrelevant since the issue is about including this app in the primary repository, which has strict requirements on apps being fully foss.
- rjzzleep 4y agoNo, clearly most people in this discussion don’t actually pay attention to the details that fdroid supports and doesn’t spend the 15 minutes of research necessary to understand it. Sad really, creating unnecessary friction as well. https://f-droid.org/en/docs/Anti-Features/ https://f-droid.org/en/docs/Anti-Features/
- lrvick 4y agoNone of those Anti-Features make software not FOSS. FOSS is still a hard requirement, but an app is allowed to talk to non-foss services, or might have open source analytics, etc. These things are flagged when true.