3 ms·
I find your arguments pretty weak. - War is enough of a force majeure, literally the first case. There's no need to sabotage infrastructure. Or at least do it o
by Animatronio 4y ago
I find your arguments pretty weak.
- War is enough of a force majeure, literally the first case. There's no need to sabotage infrastructure. Or at least do it on land, where it's easier to fix.
- One very weird way to escalate. I can think of a couple of more effective ways.
- There was no wedge after all. Germany got a bloody nose, the Russians as well. Did anyone dare accuse the US immediately after the explosions? No, but they're starting to now, probably judging that there will be no retribution.
- VincentEvans 4y agoRussia and Europe are not at war. Whether a war that Russia itself started elsewhere on it’s own accord is considered a valid excuse to unilaterally terminate existing contracts - that the courts will decide.
- Animatronio 4y agoAre they not? Gee, I must've been living under a rock. I'm sorry, I thought you said that if Russia blows up its own pipes that;s a valid force majeure, but starting a war is not. As for the courts, they will decide whatever the country they're based in decides. Simple as that.