3 ms·
"I can only have an imperfect understanding of what VJ is saying with Content-Centric Networking, and I am extrapolating some of what I knew him to have been sa
by seiji 18y ago
"I can only have an imperfect understanding of what VJ is saying with Content-Centric Networking, and I am extrapolating some of what I knew him to have been saying in the late '90s."
So you just made all of that up?
If you'd like to see the actual points (which say nothing of multicast and doesn't proclaim "group security" to be scary and magical), check out http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6972678839686672840 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6972678839686672840
It's about providing network access to everyone from mud huts in villages to gigabit connected apartments in Tokyo. It's about making networking with content retrieval work over any medium, anyplace, anytime.
It's about being able to drop "a box of Internet" someplace and having reasonable access to content.
We could have a workable solution to what Van Jacobson describes now, but mobile devices and most computers are still too caught up in privacy and network lockdown. Being "connected" doesn't mean just having Internet access. It means being able to connect to everything around you and interact meaningfully without having to go through service providers and gatekeepers.
- tptacek 18y agoOf course I didn't. I read the promotional material at PARC, and I spent years obsessing about every paper Jacobson and his team posted at ftp.ee.lbl.gov, so I'm familiar with the general subject area. I also helped crater a VC-funded startup in this area. What I did not do was sit through a Google video of VJ explaining all the implications of this Great New Idea, which is why I started my comment with a caveat. Thanks for telling me what it's about, though. I'm glad the mud huts in villages will have working content retrieval anyplace, anytime. Maybe we can get them clean running water soon afterwards.