4 ms·

I will definitely take a random substack blog more seriously. After all, he is citing "unnamed sources"! Very credible!

• nivenkos 4y ago
  It's not a random substack blog, it's one of the most famous journalists (a real one, no less!) in the world.
  • Sed47_ 4y ago
    A one with a long history of talking bullshit with nothing to back it (other than "anonymous sources").
    • miguelazo 4y ago
      Give us an example of when he was definitely wrong about something of substance. Not a minor detail, something that actually matters.