3 ms·
I thought those "lite" versions are essentially the "trial period" apps. Refund window is problematic as Google witnessed (and thus stopped it); but then again,
by rogerchucker 15y ago
I thought those "lite" versions are essentially the "trial period" apps. Refund window is problematic as Google witnessed (and thus stopped it); but then again, if your app cannot provide me long term value then may be you deserve a refund.
- jiaaro 15y agoWhat they really need is a way to link the demo and full version together in the app store. Apps with a "demo" version should have a seamless upgrade-to-paid-version experience. Some apps have done this with via in-app purchases (check out living language for example http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/living-language-spanish-for/id453341418?mt=8 http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/living-language-spanish-for/i...) which does a great job of this and manages to get $15 out of you by demonstrating the value the app provides very effectively before asking for money.
- technoslut 15y agoI don't use Android. Did Google stop this? Maybe the answer s Amazon's solution in which they demo it on the web. All I can say is that what iOS is doing is not the correct solution. Even though Omnifocus is the best to-do app, no one is going to spend $20 just to understand that.