3 ms·
> post-mortems (hate that term, nobody died) Post-incident review https://support.atlassian.com/jira-service-management-cloud/docs/what-are-post-incident-revi
by madeofpalk 4y ago
> post-mortems (hate that term, nobody died)
Post-incident review
https://support.atlassian.com/jira-service-management-cloud/docs/what-are-post-incident-reviews/ https://support.atlassian.com/jira-service-management-cloud/...
- OJFord 4y agoWe say our battery's 'dying' or the site or something's 'dead' or 'live' or 'alive again' though - post mortem makes sense in that case, I understand the objection but I think you have to object to the rest too.
- madeofpalk 4y agoWe declare an "incident". After it, you review the "incident". The site might not have even "died", but you still have an incident.
- OJFord 4y agoI agree it makes more sense, from first principles as it were, I'm just saying 'post-mortem' is consistent with other usages, so if we don't like it then we probably shouldn't like 'the server is dead' or 'the site is on its knees' etc. either.