The same reason there are sources in the footnotes on Wikipedia: so you can double check or read further. I like to think of ChatGPT and the like as an on-dema

The same reason there are sources in the footnotes on Wikipedia: so you can double check or read further. I like to think of ChatGPT and the like as an on-demand personalized Wikipedia: a good starting point, comes with strings attached, not always correct (but some are fine with it). ChatGPT doesn't link sources yet but I saw that the beta test context search from Kagi had them.