3 ms·
I think the issue of telemetry is fundamentally a human issue of incentives and trust. The system you describe is wise because it recognizes this and attempts t
by gen220 4y ago
I think the issue of telemetry is fundamentally a human issue of incentives and trust. The system you describe is wise because it recognizes this and attempts to address it.
The difficulty with telemetry is that even if we design the perfect, privacy-preserving system to begin with, once the pattern of having a network port open is established, there's nothing to prevent us (humans) from changing our policies about what we're allowed to push/pull over that port.
In real-world analogues for these kinds of thorny policy problems, we have centralized arbiters to solve these problems. That might be a fruitful course of research for people interested in this problem to explore.
Unfortunately, even though this problem has software as its medium, it is a problem that cannot be solved by clever software alone, despite any appearances to the contrary.
- JohnFen 4y ago> The difficulty with telemetry is that even if we design the perfect, privacy-preserving system The other difficult is what you mentioned: trust. Even if a piece of software really does telemetry in a perfect, privacy-preserving way -- as a user, I have to take the developer's word for that in the end. That's a hard hurdle to pass, because that trust has been violated so much in the past that nobody gets the benefit of the doubt anymore. > Unfortunately, even though this problem has software as its medium, it is a problem that cannot be solved by clever software alone I agree entirely. At the heart of it, this is not a technological problem. It's a human one.