> where I am not facing loads of incidental complexity This is my dream. Unfortunately there is no easy path to get there. We have to replace all the languages

> where I am not facing loads of incidental complexity This is my dream. Unfortunately there is no easy path to get there. We have to replace all the languages. Build replacements without the noise. > looked good using tools only in that language I think you can have a universal syntax, but not a universal language. I think Racket's term "Language Oriented Programming" is the holy grail. You need lots of DSLs because you almost always work across different domains. It is possible to have a universal syntax, however ;)