3 ms·
> It should be about user choice. Then choose a different mobile OS. > Apple's behaviour is nothing short of monopolistic and there is no good defence of it i
by rollcat 4y ago
> It should be about user choice.
Then choose a different mobile OS.
> Apple's behaviour is nothing short of monopolistic and there is no good defence of it imo.
What do you actually propose then? Force them to release Safari for Android?
Chrome/blink has about 65% mobile market share, Safari has about 30%. If you are concerned with monopoly, how would enabling Blink on iOS do a single thing to displace the actual 600 pound gorilla in the room? Or is monopoly bad only if it's not *your* preferred choice?