3 ms·
Hugged to death already? I often use terms like "sexy", "risque" etc. in the process of getting images that are quite sensible (like military people playing ch
by thanatropism 4y ago
Hugged to death already?
I often use terms like "sexy", "risque" etc. in the process of getting images that are quite sensible (like military people playing chess). I use img2img repeatedly looking for particular photo-film aesthetics and tend to accumulate prompts. Anyway, this would open me to charges of sexism (or worse "misogyny"), and makes me uneasy about using SD.
Edit/OH: it generates prompts for like Excel screenshots but not for images made with the img2img model at hugginface. Fascinating.
- thanatropism 4y agoWhy does it choke on img2img creations? This is just fascinating. It gives a plausible prompt to at least a handful of real non-AI photos from DSLRs and iphones alike.
- sahil_chaudhary 4y agoThe dataset used to train this model didn’t have any img2img data so that would explain it
- thanatropism 4y agoI mean, it does mistake Frank Sinatra for Louis Armstrong -- I guess it makes errors. But it just refuses to process my img2img images. It breaks down. Why? It made me so agitated I made a gallery[0]. Granted, some of those images are strange, but others are just normal people doing normal things. [0]: https://publish.obsidian.md/zero-chroma-infinity/Image+gallery https://publish.obsidian.md/zero-chroma-infinity/Image+galle...
- dwringer 4y agoimg2img creations are probably confusing it because they are totally rearranging how the prompt emerges from what's in the latent space with respect to a new image. So if you make an image of <subject> by passing in an image of <subject>, it's going to represent <subject> in a fundamentally different way than if it relies purely on its own "imagination" for the rendition.