4 ms·

I got ghostbanned here on another account the day I submitted a link to the story about how Bobby Fisher (the World Chess Champion) got tortured in an American

by 0x7ce 4y ago

I got ghostbanned here on another account the day I submitted a link to the story about how Bobby Fisher (the World Chess Champion) got tortured in an American jail. When I confronted dang over it he claimed against all logic that the timing was merely coincidental and I was being retroactively punished for other, different instances of wrongthink posts that I posted several weeks prior to the ban. This is how they operate here. If you post a borderline wrongthink post here, dang and his goons will scrutinize your history going back weeks looking for a superficicial justification to eliminate you.

dang 4y ago
Not one of the complaints in this thread, including the OP, come with any links. Why not let readers see for themselves and make up their own minds?
- Tozen 4y ago
  I can't say about the others or all cases, as don't have the bird's eye view or ever have been a moderator, but do know that significant sections of threads can be removed (censored?). Recently I had made a comment in the "The bottom emoji breaks rust-analyzer" (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34775549 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34775549), that comment and others just vanished. My comment wasn't flagged. Just an entire section of comments (before and after) seem to have been removed. In those cases of heavy editing, for whatever reasons, there is nothing to link to for readers to see. Additionally, when a thread is shadowbanned/ghostbanned, there is nothing for other readers to see as well. Only the creator, yourself, or possibly moderators can see. The public will not be able to see, so links to it serve no purpose. I'm just saying what I have personally observed, so don't know all the history or the behind the scenes. If something doesn't publicly exist anymore or is not accessible, there is nothing there for other readers to make up their minds about.
  - dang 4y ago
    If you mean https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34788024 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34788024, your comment was a reply to a comment that got flagged. Flagged subthreads are collapsed by default. They're still there, just in collapsed form. I don't know what you mean by shadowbanned/ghostbanned but everything remains visible to users who have 'showdead' turned on in their profile. This is in the FAQ: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html. > there is nothing there for other readers to make up their minds about. On the contrary - if people mention specific links, we can say exactly what happened to that link and this would allow readers to make up their own minds. Most "I got banned/censored" claims never supply the link because then they get to tell a one-sided, and usually entirely distorted, story.
    - Tozen 4y ago
      The rebuttal makes some good points. However, many are not going to see the contents of flagged comments nor understand the decisions behind them being so. Not to say that flagging isn't justified at times, but scores of posts that are removed with it, are not guilty of the same violation or the posters below the removed comment in violation may not even know what happened. Agree that the OP should be able to provide a link to the shadowbanned thread (if they're not having trouble doing so), because of course you will be able to see it. The context of how shadowban or ghostban is used, is debatably valid. Because the user can see the thread, but it's no longer obviously available to the public. As for showdead, seems doubtful that many would have it turned on or even be looking. Once a thread drops out of sight (likely top 100), seems most won't check (even more so if no comments) unless they are searching for something specific (which could be anything). Possibly a good example of shadowban/ghostban thread, is this recently posted one (below). It also doesn't show as "dead" either, though maybe there is some time element, and can't be seen by the public. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34838236 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34838236 (Robot war dogs commanded by soldiers using brain computer interface [video])
      - dang 4y ago
        I agree with most of your points here. The thing to understand is that these are all tradeoffs. For example, it's true that collapsing flagged subthreads by default is unfair to the users who post substantive comments in that subtree and haven't broken the site guidelines. (Sometimes we rectify this by manually snipping them, so they can go back to the top level, if we see them and they make just as much sense at the top level.) However, it's still a major improvement to thread quality overall to collapse flagged subthreads by default. Moderation is fraught with these tradeoffs, and when we find any major improvement to overall quality, we pretty much have to do it. In this sense we're basically all victims of statistics here. Re https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34838236 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34838236: that got hit by a simple spam filter. Clearly it was a false positive (another tradeoff—no spam filters without false positives). Sorry! I've restored it now*. The funny thing is, I was just looking at that particular filter this afternoon and realized it might need some work—I just haven't had time to review it yet, which involves looking at everything it has killed recently and evaluating whether it's still doing more good than harm. * ("Robot war dogs" is linkbait though, so I've taken that bit out of the title, as the site guidelines ask - https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html)
- 0x7ce 4y ago
  Here’s the evidence for you. Fact: You ghostbanned my account “unknownaccount” after posting the Fischer article - allegedly for making “unsubstantiated” submissions despite not posting any submissions for a week prior. You admitted in your own comments that I was indeed linkbanned and it was just a coincidence about the Fischer link and that I was actually retroactively banned for posting unspecified “unsubstantiated content” Like what does that even mean? All my submissions were legitimate, thought provoking logical and relevant including some well-received whistleblow criticisms against Megacorps and including the likes of Microsoft and Cloudflare-which hundreds of users upvoted mind you. It’s understandable that a myriad of corporate elements wanted me silenced, but I think you fell into their play too much. You should really give the community the FREEDOM to see what it wants, stop taking down or editing posts which PEOPLE want to see. Not just what (your handlers, their handlers, other moderators, downvote&reporting botfarm ops, gov & political agencies etc) permit the sheeple to see. Please for the sake of this community tone the oppressive censorship down a little, Get rid of your dystopian mechanisms of [deleting] wrongthink, of shadowbanning and ghostbanning. Give less credence to false flag and bad faith reports which lead to silencing as what happened to my account. The right thing to do would be to reverse the ban as there was and is infact substance to all of my claims, which many reasonable people were able to see hence why over many people agreed with my posts yet so many of them got taken down anyways. Funny how that works.
  - dang 4y ago
    I explained this to you some time ago (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33445000 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33445000): you were posting a plethora of unsubstantive Ask HNs that users were not only flagging but emailing us to complain about. That's a strong signal of community rejection, and after reviewing the posts as a moderator it was clear those users were correct. Anyone who wants to check https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=unknownaccount https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=unknownaccount with 'showdead' turned on in their profile can see this for themselves. I don't know what you mean by "the Fischer link" but the way this works is that we take away submission privileges from an account when they've been submitting too many off-topic or bad (for HN) things, and that causes the software to kill future submissions. So of course there was a time lag between the time that we did this and the time you noticed it—there always is. Btw, I didn't say "unsubstantiated" but "unsubstantive", meaning that the posts you were submitting didn't contain much information (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/unsubstantive https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/unsubstantive).

by 0x7ce 4y ago

dang 4y ago

Not one of the complaints in this thread, including the OP, come with any links. Why not let readers see for themselves and make up their own minds?

Tozen 4y ago
I can't say about the others or all cases, as don't have the bird's eye view or ever have been a moderator, but do know that significant sections of threads can be removed (censored?). Recently I had made a comment in the "The bottom emoji breaks rust-analyzer" (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34775549 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34775549), that comment and others just vanished. My comment wasn't flagged. Just an entire section of comments (before and after) seem to have been removed. In those cases of heavy editing, for whatever reasons, there is nothing to link to for readers to see. Additionally, when a thread is shadowbanned/ghostbanned, there is nothing for other readers to see as well. Only the creator, yourself, or possibly moderators can see. The public will not be able to see, so links to it serve no purpose. I'm just saying what I have personally observed, so don't know all the history or the behind the scenes. If something doesn't publicly exist anymore or is not accessible, there is nothing there for other readers to make up their minds about.
- dang 4y ago
  If you mean https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34788024 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34788024, your comment was a reply to a comment that got flagged. Flagged subthreads are collapsed by default. They're still there, just in collapsed form. I don't know what you mean by shadowbanned/ghostbanned but everything remains visible to users who have 'showdead' turned on in their profile. This is in the FAQ: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html. > there is nothing there for other readers to make up their minds about. On the contrary - if people mention specific links, we can say exactly what happened to that link and this would allow readers to make up their own minds. Most "I got banned/censored" claims never supply the link because then they get to tell a one-sided, and usually entirely distorted, story.
  - Tozen 4y ago
    The rebuttal makes some good points. However, many are not going to see the contents of flagged comments nor understand the decisions behind them being so. Not to say that flagging isn't justified at times, but scores of posts that are removed with it, are not guilty of the same violation or the posters below the removed comment in violation may not even know what happened. Agree that the OP should be able to provide a link to the shadowbanned thread (if they're not having trouble doing so), because of course you will be able to see it. The context of how shadowban or ghostban is used, is debatably valid. Because the user can see the thread, but it's no longer obviously available to the public. As for showdead, seems doubtful that many would have it turned on or even be looking. Once a thread drops out of sight (likely top 100), seems most won't check (even more so if no comments) unless they are searching for something specific (which could be anything). Possibly a good example of shadowban/ghostban thread, is this recently posted one (below). It also doesn't show as "dead" either, though maybe there is some time element, and can't be seen by the public. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34838236 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34838236 (Robot war dogs commanded by soldiers using brain computer interface [video])
    - dang 4y ago
      I agree with most of your points here. The thing to understand is that these are all tradeoffs. For example, it's true that collapsing flagged subthreads by default is unfair to the users who post substantive comments in that subtree and haven't broken the site guidelines. (Sometimes we rectify this by manually snipping them, so they can go back to the top level, if we see them and they make just as much sense at the top level.) However, it's still a major improvement to thread quality overall to collapse flagged subthreads by default. Moderation is fraught with these tradeoffs, and when we find any major improvement to overall quality, we pretty much have to do it. In this sense we're basically all victims of statistics here. Re https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34838236 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34838236: that got hit by a simple spam filter. Clearly it was a false positive (another tradeoff—no spam filters without false positives). Sorry! I've restored it now*. The funny thing is, I was just looking at that particular filter this afternoon and realized it might need some work—I just haven't had time to review it yet, which involves looking at everything it has killed recently and evaluating whether it's still doing more good than harm. * ("Robot war dogs" is linkbait though, so I've taken that bit out of the title, as the site guidelines ask - https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html)
0x7ce 4y ago
Here’s the evidence for you. Fact: You ghostbanned my account “unknownaccount” after posting the Fischer article - allegedly for making “unsubstantiated” submissions despite not posting any submissions for a week prior. You admitted in your own comments that I was indeed linkbanned and it was just a coincidence about the Fischer link and that I was actually retroactively banned for posting unspecified “unsubstantiated content” Like what does that even mean? All my submissions were legitimate, thought provoking logical and relevant including some well-received whistleblow criticisms against Megacorps and including the likes of Microsoft and Cloudflare-which hundreds of users upvoted mind you. It’s understandable that a myriad of corporate elements wanted me silenced, but I think you fell into their play too much. You should really give the community the FREEDOM to see what it wants, stop taking down or editing posts which PEOPLE want to see. Not just what (your handlers, their handlers, other moderators, downvote&reporting botfarm ops, gov & political agencies etc) permit the sheeple to see. Please for the sake of this community tone the oppressive censorship down a little, Get rid of your dystopian mechanisms of [deleting] wrongthink, of shadowbanning and ghostbanning. Give less credence to false flag and bad faith reports which lead to silencing as what happened to my account. The right thing to do would be to reverse the ban as there was and is infact substance to all of my claims, which many reasonable people were able to see hence why over many people agreed with my posts yet so many of them got taken down anyways. Funny how that works.
- dang 4y ago
  I explained this to you some time ago (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33445000 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33445000): you were posting a plethora of unsubstantive Ask HNs that users were not only flagging but emailing us to complain about. That's a strong signal of community rejection, and after reviewing the posts as a moderator it was clear those users were correct. Anyone who wants to check https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=unknownaccount https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=unknownaccount with 'showdead' turned on in their profile can see this for themselves. I don't know what you mean by "the Fischer link" but the way this works is that we take away submission privileges from an account when they've been submitting too many off-topic or bad (for HN) things, and that causes the software to kill future submissions. So of course there was a time lag between the time that we did this and the time you noticed it—there always is. Btw, I didn't say "unsubstantiated" but "unsubstantive", meaning that the posts you were submitting didn't contain much information (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/unsubstantive https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/unsubstantive).